Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:58

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Report: Steelers, Dolphins renew talks about a trade for Jonnu Smith - NBC Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Kristopher Mohamed needs help to fund cancer fight - Trinidad and Tobago Newsday
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Tucker Barnhart Elects Free Agency - MLB Trade Rumors
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Here Are the 2025 BET Awards Winners: Full List - Billboard
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Invitation from Google hints at earlier than expected Pixel 10 release - PhoneArena
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Netflix anime boosts Devil May Cry 5 sales to over 10m - Eurogamer
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Have you ever lied to your family? What were the circumstances?